Anonymous asked: So I've read your views on how to be happy. How do you feel that those views fit with depression?

The scope of my views excludes people with depression or other mental illnesses that would otherwise cause them to not be in total control of their emotions or moods. I’m not insane enough to tell a person suffering from depression to grow some balls and choose to be happy, which I’m assuming was your concern.

Anonymous asked: do you think you deserve to be eic?

I think you think I don’t. 

Yes, its important too learn you’re homophones.

But still, no comprendo how people are still getting a kick out of correcting other people’s grammar and spelling. Yeah, I get it, some sad chick mixed up her “your” and “you’re” so you asterisk-megapwned that bitch which only served to further incite her to screw up her “their” and “there” so then you decided to screenshot that utter and complete fail at life and post it to Facebook, allowing all your buddies to like it and confirm your belief that you are, indeed, the man with the slickest wit spewing forth from his glorious ten-ton ballsack on planet Earth and that your timely rectification was a sure blessing in this pitiable illiterate wench’s life.

Yeah, I see you gleefully throw your head back and cackle, knowing that it’s only a matter of time before the entire world bows down to your linguistic superiority. 

"For in much wisdom is much grief; and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow."

— Ecclesiastes 1:18

thefrogman:

This does nothing. 

Contrary to what’s stated above, there was no nationwide “gas out” in 1997. None. There was one in 1999, and it did generate a fair amount of media attention, but it didn’t cause gas prices to drop 30 cents per gallon overnight — in fact, it didn’t cause gas prices to drop at all. Despite the popularity of the chain letter, the 1999 “event” attracted few active participants and was completely ineffectual.

It was a dumb idea 10 years ago. It’s a dumb idea now. You still buy the exact same amount of gasoline but on a different day. If you want lower gas prices, everyone must use less gas.

thefrogman:

This does nothing. 

Contrary to what’s stated above, there was no nationwide “gas out” in 1997. None. There was one in 1999, and it did generate a fair amount of media attention, but it didn’t cause gas prices to drop 30 cents per gallon overnight — in fact, it didn’t cause gas prices to drop at all. Despite the popularity of the chain letter, the 1999 “event” attracted few active participants and was completely ineffectual.

It was a dumb idea 10 years ago. It’s a dumb idea now. You still buy the exact same amount of gasoline but on a different day. If you want lower gas prices, everyone must use less gas.

(Source: imgfave)

early-onset-of-night:

Which, for the first time in EOoN history, occurred OFF Tumblr. The political editors here on Tumblr may hate me, but soon they won’t be able to deny me. Claimed power is the best defense against imposed weakness :)

A commenter dug up the stats I used in the article. I didn’t reference them. As a blogger and speaker of words, I can say absolutely anything and am under no obligation to prove anything. But here they are, thanks to Dale Ruff:

Number of prisoners:
# 1 United States: 2,019,234 prisoners.
# 2 China: 1,549,000 prisoners (with nearly 4 times more people than the US).
# 3 Russia: 846,967 prisoners.
# 4 India: 313,635 prisoners (with nearly 4 times more people than the US).
# 5 Brazil: 308,304 prisoners.
# 6 Thailand: 213,815 prisoners.
# 7 Ukraine: 198,386 prisoners.

Dale cited a source, Ron Paul, and you can do with it what you will. My contention in the article was that the U.S. locks up more people than China, despite having a population of some one billion LESS, and I AM RIGHT.

In the article I wrote, as in every article I write, I was a huge smartass. People took issue with this. They misinterpreted my sarcasm and hyperbole. They thought I was serious. I was serious, but not about the things they thought I was. Ah, well. NASCAR is popular for a reason. One woman from San Diego especially called me out, saying I damaged my credibility (as if that was a real thing), and blah blah blah. I responded to her with this:

“You are absolutely right, Random Woman In San Diego. I will change the way I write from now on. I don’t know what I was thinking. I was probably drunk on legal alcohol at the time of the article writing. I didn’t know what I was doing. Forgive me? In the future, I will eliminate all sarcasm, satirical elements, and hyperbole and just write plain old unconfusing articles of beige colors and perfectly square proportions. My “credibility” with a handful of random people on the internet is very important to me, but not as important as it is with you, Random Woman In San Diego. PM me your email address and I will send you rough drafts of everything I write in the future so that I can get your stamp of approval.

Having said all that, I would like to ask you, the entire internet, for forgiveness. I didn’t mean to point out all this insane for-profit prison crap and make you uncomfortable as you watch NASCAR and think everything is just fine and dandy except for Obama being in the White House. I also didn’t mean to point it out in such a smartass way either. All I ever wanted to be growing up was Batman and now I know I have taken a wrong turn. Thank you for showing me the light with your numerous comments, many of which contain correct spelling, complete thoughts, and appropriate punctuation. I hereby cease my writing activities for the time being while I reassess my life.

If you need me I will be saying the pledge of allegiance over and over again in a WASP church somewhere while actually believing we won the War of 1812.

Yours humbly,
Mike”

So, yeah.

Same.

Pretty sure Jesus wasn’t a newborn when that party happened, so make that 1979 years or so.

Pretty sure Jesus wasn’t a newborn when that party happened, so make that 1979 years or so.

(via what-is-this-i-dont-even)

Anonymous asked: What are your religious beliefs?

I’m an atheist, but you probably already guessed that. I honestly don’t mind people who believe in God, as long as religion doesn’t become an excuse for them to tell others what is moral or not just because an omnipotent being supposedly said so. Personally, I believe religion is organized delusion, but I don’t go around denouncing religious people left and right, so don’t get me wrong here. I tend to say live and let live when it comes to religion, because how are you ever going to reconcile someone’s faith with your own if it’s just that - faith - not reason or science, which can be proven. (Although that’s actually iffy as well when you consider epistemics. There was a fascinating article about that in The Stone of the New York Times, if you’re interested.) So, yeah. I suppose an atheist fanatic is no better than a religious fanatic. Sorry if this seems like a tangent to you, but why not take the opportunity to turn a question into a mini post if it feels right, right?

"To show an unfelt sorrow is an office / Which the false man does easy."

— Macbeth (2.3.161-162)

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

Brighter Than Sunshine - Aqualung